The warmer it gets this summer — both in terms of the temperature and Canada’s upcoming election—the more likely we are to discuss climate change, and policy intended to combat it. In very broad strokes, the campaign angles are these: One side thinks that running against a Carbon Tax might be a winning message, while the other side wants to ‘put a price on pollution’. They’re not the only options, however.But in terms of how likely the eventual winner is to make a difference in our fight to keep the Earth from irreversible damage, how much does it actually matter who you vote for? Is any party even close to proposing what it would take to make a serious dent in the challenges we face? What would it really take for government policy to come in line with the consensus of the scientific community? What would a climate change approach based in real data look like, one aimed at making the kind of difference the smart people who are getting really freaked out would approve of?GUEST: Mike De Souza, Managing Editor, National ObserverAudio Playerhttp://media.blubrry.com/thebigstory/s/radio.pmd.rogersdigitalmedia.com/podcasts/thebigstory/tbs_03272019.mp300:0000:0000:00Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.You can subscribe to The Big Story podcast on iTunes or Google Play.You can also find it at thebigstorypodcast.ca.
Some key elements of Quebec’s secularism bill, tabled Thursday by the Coalition Avenir Quebec government.Who is covered by the prohibition on religious symbols?Elementary and high school teachers; principals and assistant principals; provincially appointed judges; police officers and peace officers working primarily in Quebec; prison guards; Crown prosecutors; the Speaker of the legislature; members of provincial commissions and boards; ajudicators for tribunals and disciplinary bodies; public inquiry commissioners; arbitrators; the minister of justice and attorney general.The law won’t apply to private school teachers or professors at junior colleges and universities.What religious symbols are prohibited?The bill does offers no definition. Immigration, Diversity and Inclusion Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette said symbols of all religions are included, no matter how small or whether they’re visible. That includes a cross, kirpan, hijab, turban, kippa or anything similar. Not included are dreadlocks or tattoos of religious symbols.Who will enforce the rules?The bill says the “person exercising the highest administrative authority” will make sure employees are in compliance. Jolin-Barrette said the guiding principle for those in authority is that the wearing of religious symbols is forbidden. However there wouldn’t be a “strip search to check if the person is wearing a religious sign,” he said.Who is exempt and how many people are affected?Those who were employed by bodies as of Wednesday and wear a religious symbol will not be required to remove it, as long as they “exercise the same function within the same organization.” Jolin-Barrette said the law affects a few hundred people.When must faces be uncovered?The law calls on a wide array of public servants to exercise their functions with their face uncovered. Meanwhile, people who want to receive public services “must have their face uncovered where doing so is necessary to allow their identity to be verified or for security reasons.”Where did the government compromise?The government announced it would support removing the crucifix from the legislature chamber. It also included a grandfather clause covering employees who already wear symbols.Does it infringe on rights and freedoms?The bill includes the notwithstanding clause to shield it from constitutional challenges. The clause contained within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms allows authorities to override charter protections for a five-year period.When will it become law?Jolin-Barrette said he hopes a final bill can pass before the legislature recesses for the summer on June 15.The Canadian Press